Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41968522›Full record

ArticleChemical research in toxicology2026

Neutralization Kinetics and Transport Define the Dermal Decontamination Window for Warfare and Industrial Toxicants.

Laurent Simon, Ishita Kulkarni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laurent SimonOtto H York Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark New Jersey 07102, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6205-4467
Ishita KulkarniOtto H York Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark New Jersey 07102, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical warfare agents that are moderately to highly volatile can readily permeate the skin, posing an acute systemic toxicity risk. Effective decontamination depends on how intervention timing and chemical reactivity jointly shape dermal absorption, evaporation, and neutralization. While earlier finite-dose models characterized dermal uptake, they lacked decontaminant reactivity and failed to quantify how neutralization competes with diffusion and surface clearance. This work presents a unified, dimensionless framework integrating diffusion, evaporation, and reactive neutralization. The system behavior is governed by two dimensionless groups: a surface-loss number (

Indexed as

Chemical Warfare AgentsDecontaminationSkinDiffusionHumansKineticsSkin AbsorptionChemical Warfare Agents

Identifiers

PMID41968522
PMCPMC13188160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.