Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41968506›Full record

ArticleBioFactors (Oxford, England)

Optimizing Alternating Current Electrical Stimulation Parameters to Enhance Osteoblasts Differentiation.

Jesús Bocio-Núñez, Mª José Montoya-García, Mª Ángeles Vázquez-Gámez, Daniel Martín, Pedro Chacón, Miguel Ángel Rico, Miguel Ángel Colmenero, Alberto Yufera, Mercè Giner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioFactors (Oxford, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jesús Bocio-NúñezUGC Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2707-5550
Mª José Montoya-GarcíaDpto de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4946-6667
Mª Ángeles Vázquez-GámezDpto de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7689-6999
Daniel MartínInstituto de Microelectrónica de Sevilla - Universidad de Sevilla (IMSE-US), Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0590-7341
Pedro ChacónDepartamento de Ciencias de la Salud y Biomédicas, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0925-814X
Miguel Ángel RicoUGC Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7021-5187
Miguel Ángel ColmeneroUGC Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1622-0775
Alberto YuferaInstituto de Microelectrónica de Sevilla - Universidad de Sevilla (IMSE-US), Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1814-6089
Mercè GinerDpto. Citología e Histología Normal y Patológica, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8285-0767

Funding

Regional Ministry of Economy and Knowledge of Junta de Andalucía P18-FR-2038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical stimulation (ES) has emerged as a promising technique in the field of bioengineering and biomedicine, particularly in bone regeneration and cell differentiation. ES using alternating current (AC) is based on the periodic reversal of current direction, which generates oscillating electric fields. The application of an electric field has effects on cell growth and differentiation, as well as on morphology and migration. This study aimed to explore the effect of applying AC electrostimulation within the proliferation, differentiation, and morphology process of osteoblastic cells. The electrical stimulation signals were daily applied for 3 h during 14 days. Different frequencies were tested (1 Hz, 10 Hz, 100 Hz, and 1 kHz), with amplitudes of 125, 250, 500, 750, 1000, and 1500 mV/mm. Cell viability was estimated using the AlamarBlue, and MC3T3-E1 differentiation levels were evaluated through alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity. RUNX2, OSX, ALP, OPG, and RANKL gene expression was assessed by RT-PCR. Morphological analysis was performed through cell transfection followed by immunofluorescence. Statistical analysis was conducted by SPSS.23 and graphs generated through Graph-pad. Viability and ALP activity were optimal at 10 Hz. Once the frequency was defined, RUNX2, OSX, ALP, OPG, and RANKL gene expression revealed an increase in the differentiation and osteogenic activity levels at 10 Hz and 500-750 mV/mm. As well as, morphological studies showed an increase in the area, pseudopodia length, and numbers at 500 mV 10 Hz conditions. The optimal ES condition to differentiate MC3T3-E1 cells is 10 Hz 500-750 mV/mm. Electrostimulation has emerged as a promising technique in the field of bioengineering and biomedicine, particularly in bone regeneration and cell early maturation.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationElectric StimulationOsteoblasts3T3 CellsAlkaline PhosphataseAnimalsCell SurvivalCore Binding Factor Alpha 1 SubunitGene ExpressionMiceOsteoprotegerinRANK LigandSp7 Transcription FactorAlkaline PhosphataseCore Binding Factor Alpha 1 SubunitOsteoprotegerinRANK LigandSp7 Transcription Factoralternating currentelectric‐stimulationMC3T3‐E1osteoblaststissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID41968506
PMCPMC13071225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.