ArticleAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2026
Stabilizing Extreme Few-Shot ECG Classification via Self-Supervised Contrastive Pretraining.
Article in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Critical Appraisal of Self-Supervised Contrastive Pretraining for Extreme Few-Shot ECG Classification.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis, high-quality annotations are expensive and difficult to scale, leaving many tasks in an extreme few-shot learning regime. We formulate a single-label Top-5 rhythm classification task on PTB-XL and strictly limit supervised training to N = 70 labeled samples (14 per class) to characterize failure modes of scratch training and assess the stabilizing effect of self-supervised learning (SSL). We first perform SimCLR-style contrastive pretraining with the NT-Xent loss on 16,304 unlabeled ECG recordings, followed by supervised fine-tuning. To isolate the independent contribution of SSL initialization, downstream augmentation is disabled (NoAug) in the core evaluation. Performance and stability are assessed using Macro-F1, best validation epoch, and a collapse rate defined as Best Epoch ≤ 1. Under N = 70, scratch training exhibits systematic early collapse (Macro-F1 = 0.115 ± 0.072; collapse rate = 66.7%), which is not alleviated by strong downstream augmentation alone (0.108 ± 0.042; 66.7%). In contrast, SSL fine-tuning without downstream augmentation improves Macro-F1 to 0.192 ± 0.003 and reduces the collapse rate to 0%, with markedly reduced inter-seed variance. A balanced N = 300 reference achieves Macro-F1 = 0.297 ± 0.018. These results indicate that, in extreme few-shot ECG classification, the primary bottleneck is training reproducibility rather than peak accuracy, and SSL contrastive pretraining provides a robust initialization that substantially mitigates collapse and improves usability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.