ArticleImplementation science communications2026
Implementing the Safer Baby Bundle for stillbirth prevention across Queensland maternity services using a modified breakthrough series collaborative.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAustralia's ≥ 28‑weeks stillbirth rate is 19.5% higher than that of high‑income countries with the lowest rates. The Safer Baby Bundle (SBB) is a national initiative to reduce stillbirth in Australia targeting five components of antenatal care and is the key prevention strategy within National Stillbirth Action and Implementation Plan. This paper reports the experience in one Australian state that delivered the Safer Baby Bundle Improvement Project (SBBIP) to support clinical staff implementing the SBB. In the setting of extreme maternity workforce challenges compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic, the implementation used a modified Breakthrough Series Collaborative (BTS).
methodsOver an 18-month period, antenatal services across Queensland used a modified BTS Collaborative approach, removing the need for teams to document Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, use statistical process control (SPC) charts, document project progress scores and monthly reporting. Engagement during the improvement effort was assessed. A before-and-after multimethod study was used to evaluate the program. Routinely collected perinatal data, clinical audits, project administrative data and surveys of healthcare professionals and women receiving antenatal care were used to measure improvements before and after implementation, and logistic regression interrupted time series (ITS) analyses were used for comparisons of the outcomes.
resultsDespite disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic, the SBB was implemented across antenatal services, and the modified BTS implementation strategy achieved positive results. Eighty-nine percent of the 45 enrolled teams were actively engaged in the improvement effort across the SBBIP and all (100%) implemented one or more change ideas. Post implementation, improvements were observed in all key process measures and balance measures (planned singleton birth before 39 weeks, late preterm and early-term singleton births), whereas other measures remained unchanged. The stillbirth rate ≥ 28 weeks in singletons remained at 2.1 per 1000 births before and after implementation. ITS analyses of eligible measures supported these patterns.
conclusionsIn an environment challenged by workforce shortages, high workload demand, and competing priorities (global pandemic), a modified BTS Collaborative approach is a useful model to implement improvement at scale to reduce stillbirth risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.