SynthesisJournal of medical imaging and radiation oncology2026
Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) requires accurate identification of thromboembolic and perfusion defects for diagnosis and operability assessment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides radiation-free evaluation of vascular morphology, perfusion distribution and cardiopulmonary function. However, its diagnostic performance in CTEPH has not been comprehensively synthesised. PURPOSE: This review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI techniques for detecting chronic thromboembolic material and perfusion defects in CTEPH.
methodsA systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251134001). PubMed, Medline, Embase and Google Scholar were searched from January 2000 to October 2025 for studies assessing MRI-based detection of CTEPH using accepted reference standards, including computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy or multidisciplinary consensus. Eligible studies evaluated MRI perfusion, contrast-enhanced MR angiography (ce-MRA), non-contrast MRA or advanced MRI techniques in adults with suspected or confirmed CTEPH. Data extraction was performed in duplicate, and the risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Due to heterogeneity among the included studies, the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) framework was used to guide data synthesis.
resultsNine studies involving 563 participants met the inclusion criteria. Across eight MRI perfusion studies, the median sensitivity was 97% and the median specificity was 92.5%. Standard MRI perfusion demonstrated similar performance (median sensitivity 97%, specificity 92%). Three ce-MRA studies yielded a median sensitivity of 87.7% and specificity of 98.1%. Non-contrast MRA showed lower standalone diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 45%, specificity 76%) but improved markedly when combined with ce-MRA. Risk of bias was moderate to high across studies, driven primarily by non-consecutive patient selection, variable reference standards and heterogeneity in MRI protocols.
conclusionMRI demonstrates encouraging diagnostic performance for detecting perfusion defects and chronic thromboembolic material in CTEPH, with MRI perfusion offering high sensitivity and ce-MRA showing high specificity. Non-contrast MRA adds value for proximal vessel assessment when used alongside ce-MRA. However, methodological limitations and study heterogeneity constrain the certainty of existing evidence. Larger, standardised prospective studies are needed to define the precise role of MRI within contemporary CTEPH diagnostic pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.