Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41968345›Full record

ArticleMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2026

Effect of tactile-kinesthetic stimulation on breastfeeding performance among preterm neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Selvi S, Valarmathi V, Subash S, Helen Shaji J C

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Selvi SSRM College of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, 603203, India. selvis@srmist.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9078-8836
Valarmathi VSRM College of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, 603203, India. valarmav@srmist.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0451-1905
Subash SDepartment of Paediatrics, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, 603203, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6255-7125
Helen Shaji J CSRM College of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, 603203, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3006-2029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPreterm birth, which means the baby is born before the 37th week of pregnancy, is very often linked to a later start in breastfeeding and to feeding problems because the baby’s neuromotor system is not yet fully coordinated. Early sensory interventions like tactile-kinesthetic stimulation (TKS) can potentially improve the feeding skills and physiological stability of preterm babies.

methodsThis research, a quasi-experimental pre-test and post-test control group design, was carried out in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of a tertiary care hospital. Forty eligible neonates were recruited using purposive sampling and allocated alternately to the experimental group (n = 20) and control group (n = 20). Neonates who met the inclusion criteria, such as gestational age 28–37 weeks, postnatal age 11–28 days at the time of data collection, birth weight 800 g to 1500 g, and delivery through either normal vaginal delivery or lower segment caesarean section (LSCS), were included in the study. The intervention was carried out by the researcher, who was a proficient neonatal stimulator. The study group underwent 30 min of tactile, kinesthetic stimulation, which included gentle stroking and passive leg movements, thrice a day for seven successive days before each breastfeed. On the other hand, the control group was given standard NICU care without any additional stimulation. Breastfeeding performance was assessed using the Preterm Infant Breastfeeding Behavior Scale (PIBBS). Data were analysed using paired t-tests and independent t-tests with SPSS software. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsBefore the intervention, the mean breastfeeding performance score was 4.80 ± 1.64 in the experimental group and 5.10 ± 1.50 in the control group, indicating that there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Following the intervention, the mean breastfeeding performance score in the experimental group substantially rose to 14.60 ± 1.57, while the control group experienced only a minor rise to 6.20 ± 1.45. The enhancement in breastfeeding performance in the experimental group was statistically significant when compared to the control group (t = 32.19, P < 0.001).

conclusionInitially, breastfeeding scores between the two groups were equivalent. Nevertheless, after tactile, kinesthetic stimulation, the experimental group showed a substantial enhancement in breastfeeding ability compared to the control group. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Breastfeeding performanceDevelopmental careNICUPreterm neonatesTactile-kinesthetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41968345
PMCPMC13072653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.