ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2026
CytoBatchFlagR: A Comprehensive Framework to Objectively Assess High-Parameter Cytometry Data for Batch Effects.
Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid advancements in mass and flow cytometry technologies have allowed researchers to generate and analyze high-dimensional single cell datasets, often utilizing upwards of 40 protein markers. Such high-parameter cytometry is increasingly used in longitudinal immunological studies, but technical variations across experimental batch runs can confound biological signals. To mitigate the impact on downstream analyses, many studies include reference control samples in every run, and several approaches exist to adjust for batch effects. However, tools that objectively identify problematic batches and markers present within a dataset are limited. We introduce CytoBatchFlagR, a comprehensive and interpretable tool designed to flag batch-related problems at the marker and cell cluster level based on robust statistical evaluations. Batch and marker variations are assessed based on median signal intensities of negative and positive cell populations and positive cell frequencies, along with Earth Mover's Distance (EMD) of signal intensity distributions. Additionally, CytoBatchFlagR identifies cell type specific batch problems via unsupervised clustering. The tool is suitable for mass and flow cytometry datasets where it objectively detects distinct types of batch issues. We developed and tested CytoBatchFlagR using three cytometry datasets to demonstrate its utility and performance. We also demonstrated CytoBatchFlagR's effectiveness in assessing datasets that include or lack reference controls. CytoBatchFlagR improves quality control by enabling objective identification of technical variations that may impact downstream analysis in high-parameter cytometry data. The tool uses a series of complementary metrics to identify potential batch-related problems at the marker and cell population level and presents the results through interpretable visualizations. This allows users to make informed decisions about whether to apply batch correction or exclude specific batches or markers from downstream analyses. CytoBatchFlagR is freely available as R scripts, with documentation and a tutorial to help users get started.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.