Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41968302›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2026

Paincontrol: identity-preserving pain expression transfer with generative diffusion models.

Yasamin Zarghami, Muhammad Muzammil, Vida Adeli, Hailey Reimer, Thomas Hadjistavropoulos, Babak Taati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yasamin ZarghamiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. yasamin.zarghami920@gmail.com.
Muhammad MuzammilDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. m.muzammil@mail.utoronto.ca.
Vida AdeliDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hailey ReimerDepartment of Psychology and Centre on Aging and Health, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada.
Thomas HadjistavropoulosDepartment of Psychology and Centre on Aging and Health, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada.
Babak TaatiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated pain detection models rely on large, diverse facial expression datasets; yet pain expression data are scarce due to privacy concerns and ethical constraints. This study explores synthetic pain expression generation as a potential solution, investigating whether expression transfer methods are sufficiently accurate to expand training sets by transferring expressions from a limited set of real data to a virtually unlimited set of identities. This work represents an initial step toward the use of privacy-preserving generative AI for synthetic data generation to improve in pain detection. We introduce PainControl, a novel facial landmark-guided method for identity-preserving pain expression transfer. Rather than using motion signals from video, as in prior methods, our method adapts a ControlNet approach, using text and dense facial landmarks to control fine-grained facial muscle activations while maintaining identity consistency through image embeddings. Identity preservation enables the generation of demographically diverse datasets, improving generalizability across populations. We compare PainControl to existing expression transfer methods and evaluate (i) perceptual realism, (ii) identity preservation, (iii) facial action unit (AU) transfer accuracy, and (iv) downstream pain detection performance. Our model produces realistic synthetic pain expressions, outperforming baselines in human-rated Likert-scale assessments. However, AU transfer analysis reveals challenges in accurately synthesizing expression intensities-particularly for AU4 (Brow Lowering) and AU43 (Eye Closure), which are crucial for pain recognition. When used to augment real pain datasets, synthetic images did not improve classifier performance, likely due to artifacts, AU misalignment, and the lack of temporal motion cues. Critically, however, our experiments in data-scarce regimes, where real pain expressions are extremely limited, demonstrate that synthetic augmentation through PainControl provides significant and consistent performance gains for pain detection models. These results validate that our ControlNet-based approach has reached sufficient maturity and accuracy to serve as a reliable data augmentation tool in pain detection domains, particularly in scenarios, where acquiring real data are prohibitively difficult or ethically constrained. This finding establishes the practical viability of expression transfer methods for addressing the fundamental data scarcity challenge in affective computing and clinical pain assessment. These results highlight both the promise and current limitations of generative models for pain expression, pointing to future research in AU alignment and temporal modeling for clinical-grade applications.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPainDiffusionGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumans

Identifiers

PMID41968302
PMCPMC13214276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.