ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Improved Clinical Outcomes in Anastomotic Leak Management Using Preemptive Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy After Esophagectomy.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnastomotic leakage (AL) remains one of the most feared complications after esophagectomy. Preemptive endoscopic vacuum therapy (pEVT) has been proposed to support anastomotic healing, but robust clinical data remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the role of pEVT in the management of AL.
methodsA retrospective cohort study analyzed 116 esophageal cancer patients who experienced AL after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy between 2012 and 2023. The patients were categorized into two groups: those who received therapeutic EVT (tEVT) after AL diagnosis without prior pEVT and those who experienced AL despite receiving pEVT and subsequently required tEVT as well. Clinical outcomes, leak severity, and hospital metrics were compared with a focus on endoscopic management of AL.
resultsThe patients in the pEVT group presented with significantly less severe leaks (ZACC grade II: 36.7% vs. 5.4%; p < 0.001), required less intracavitary therapy (43.4% vs. 67.9%; p = 0.027), and exhibited lower postoperative inflammation. Preemptive EVT was independently associated with favorable leak grading (odds ratio, 14.4; p = 0.004), a 69% reduced need for intracavitary treatment (p = 0.027), and markedly shorter intensive care unit (ICU: -74.4%; p < 0.001) and hospital (-27.5%; p = 0.011) stays. The overall healing rate was high in both groups (pEVT: 85%; non-pEVT: 80.4%).
conclusionsPreemptive EVT significantly reduces the clinical severity of AL and facilitates faster recovery by shortening ICU and hospital stays. These findings highlight its value as a preventive strategy for high-risk patients undergoing esophagectomy. Prospective studies are needed to validate these promising results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.