ArticleScientific reports2026
High throughput screen reveals four compounds with novel antifungal activity, including a metal-responsive candidate with in vivo efficacy against Candida albicans.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fungal infections represent a growing global health concern, aggravated by the paucity of effective antifungal therapies and the rapid rise of drug resistance. The development of new treatments is challenging due to the shared eukaryotic biology of fungi and human hosts, which restricts selective molecular targets and contributes to issues such as host toxicity and fungistatic activity. These challenges underscore the pressing need for new agents with distinct modes of action. In this study, we identified four promising compounds with novel antifungal activity from a high-throughput screen of 20,000 compounds against the opportunistic fungal pathogen, Candida albicans, namely Z1199266541, Z1024453766, Z56842335, and Z126932704. Subsequently, the compounds were characterized in vitro to assess their spectrum of activity, efficacy against a fluconazole-resistant isolate (CaCi-17), and effectiveness in combination treatments, followed by in vivo evaluation in a Galleria mellonella infection model. Among the candidates, Z56842335 emerged as a lead compound, effectively clearing infection caused by the Candida albicans in this invertebrate model. Mechanistic analyses revealed that the antifungal activity of Z56842335 is mitigated by supplementation with iron, copper, and zinc, indicating a metal-dependent mode of action. Notably, despite its apparent metal-binding capacity, Z56842335 displays a narrow spectrum of activity, targeting only C. albicans and, to a lesser extent C. dubliniensis. This selectivity suggests that, in addition to metal availability, species-specific factors such as differences in metal acquisition, intracellular metal buffering, or compound uptake or accumulation may contribute to susceptibility, highlighting a promising yet mechanistically intriguing avenue for further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.