ArticleScientific reports2026
Precise identification of tomato leaf diseases based on the real background of DPEN.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As an important economic crop, tomato is vulnerable to various diseases, and these diseases often have high visual similarity, making identification difficult. A delay in diagnosis can have a significant effect on tomato yields. Traditional manual visual inspection methods have poor accuracy, while laboratory diagnostic methods are inefficient, making them unsuitable for large-scale agricultural scenarios. To address this challenge, this study involved the collection and construction of a tomato leaf disease dataset in a real planting environment, and AutoAugment was used to achieve sample diversity and balance the number of training samples in different categories. Additionally, a dual-path ensemble network (DPEN) was proposed, which combines the multiscale feature extraction advantages of GoogLeNet with the dense connection mechanism of DenseNet121. The experimental results show that, compared with the comparison models, the DPEN achieves an identification precision of 98.80% on the self-built dataset, which is an improvement of 2.33% to 9.24%, and a reduction in the number of parameters by 7.09 M compared with GoogLeNet and 2.07 M compared with DenseNet121. The experimental results on public datasets further demonstrated the accuracy of the proposed DPEN model in identifying tomato leaf diseases in complex backgrounds. These results prove that the DPEN model can achieve precise, rapid, and efficient identification of tomato leaf diseases in complex backgrounds, providing technical support for smart agriculture applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.