Observational studyAnnals of hematology2026
Treatment patterns, effectiveness, and safety of daratumumab-based regimens in Chinese patients with multiple myeloma: longer follow-up of the real-world MMY4032 study.
Observational study in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The multicenter, noninterventional, observational MMY4032 study is a large-scale, real-world study exploring daratumumab (DARA) in Chinese patients (n = 212) with multiple myeloma (MM) who have received ≤ 3 prior lines of therapy. In the first interim analysis (median follow-up, 10.5 months), DARA was often initiated in second-line therapy, often given in combination with a proteasome inhibitor and/or immunomodulatory drug, and induced high response rates (overall response rate [ORR], 71.8%) and acceptable safety. Here, we report treatment patterns, efficacy, and safety from the second interim analysis with a longer median follow-up of 16.2 months. At the time of this analysis, median duration of DARA exposure was 8.2 months. Among 189 response-evaluable patients, the ORR was 74.1% and the very good partial response or better rate was 55.6%. Minimal residual disease–negativity rate was 60.0% among tested patients. Median progression-free and overall survival were 32.8 months and not reached, respectively; 12-month rates were 77.9% and 87.8%. Response and survival rates were higher with DARA initiation in earlier lines of therapy. Median time to next treatment was not reached with most DARA-based regimens. Adverse drug reactions and serious adverse events were reported in 20.3% and 15.6% of patients, respectively. Overall, with longer follow-up of the MMY4032 study, responses deepened, and survival rates remained high with DARA-based regimens, with more favorable outcomes observed with earlier DARA initiation. No new safety concerns were observed. These real-world data continue to support early use of DARA-based regimens as a standard of care for Chinese patients with MM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.