Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41968167›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Psychological and sociodemographic contexts of attitudes towards new genomic techniques (NGT) foods and products in Poland.

Jagoda Różycka, Łukasz Jach, Monika Stojek, Marek Marzec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jagoda Różycka *Institute of Psychology, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Łukasz Jach *Institute of Psychology, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Monika Stojek *Institute of Psychology, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Marek MarzecFaculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland. marek.marzec@us.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New Genomic Techniques (NGTs) offer promising opportunities to improve agricultural productivity and sustainability; however, their public acceptance remains uncertain. Guided by the Tripartite Attitude Model, this study tested hypotheses concerning psychological and demographic predictors of attitudes toward NGT food products. This study examined demographic and psychological (i.e., cognitive, affective, and behavioral) factors influencing attitudes toward NGT food products in a Polish sample (N = 850; aged 18-88). Participants provided information on their expectations regarding NGT foods, their opinions on the changes that the introduction of NGT foods would bring, their willingness to try NGT products, and their opinions on the effectiveness of encouragement to the consumption of NGT products, along with assessments of conspiracy beliefs, attitudes toward science, food neophobia, food technology neophobia, disgust sensitivity, consumer awareness, and political orientation. Results revealed that older participants showed lower willingness to try NGT foods compared to younger groups. Moreover, positive attitudes toward science, openness to new foods, and subjective consumer awareness were positive predictors of favorable attitudes toward NGT foods. In contrast, food technology neophobia and conspiracy beliefs were negative predictors of these attitudes. Our findings emphasize the importance of psychological and sociodemographic contexts in shaping consumer acceptance of innovative food technologies, highlighting the need for targeted communication strategies to address skepticism and enhance trust.

Indexed as

AttitudeFood TechnologyGenomicsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overConsumer BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolandSociodemographic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAttitudes towards scienceConspiracy beliefsConsumer attitudesFood technology neophobiaGenome-edited foodsNew genomic techniques (NGTs)

Identifiers

PMID41968167
PMCPMC13230753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.