ArticleScientific reports2026
Performance of eco-friendly geopolymer loadbearing bricks for thermally comfortable structures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Load-bearing masonry offers an eco-friendly alternative by reducing the use of cement and steel in the construction industry. However, bricks that satisfy structural requirements (high compressive strength and low water absorption) usually have high density and thermal conductivity, leading to greater energy demand for indoor heating and cooling. This study addresses that challenge by developing sustainable load-bearing bricks with improved thermal insulation. Bricks were fabricated and tested using ordinary concrete and geopolymer mixes based on industrial waste (fly ash and slag), incorporating lightweight coarse aggregate and air-entraining admixtures in various combinations. The compressive strength, water absorption, and thermal conductivity of each brick type were evaluated, and microstructural analysis (SEM/EDX) was performed. The results show that a fly ash-based geopolymer brick incorporating an air-entraining additive achieved the best balance between structural and thermal performance, exhibiting a compressive strength of 43 MPa, water absorption of 4%, and thermal conductivity of 0.7 W/m·K. These values satisfy load-bearing masonry requirements while providing lower thermal conductivity compared with typical conventional concrete bricks reported in the literature. The improved performance is attributed to the combined effect of geopolymer binder formation and the presence of distributed air pores that reduce heat transfer. These findings demonstrate that waste-derived geopolymer binders combined with lightweight aggregates and air-entraining admixtures provide a promising approach for producing high-performance, energy-efficient masonry units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.