ArticleScientific reports2026
Environmental DNA reveals hidden eukaryotic diversity and fine-scale community patterns across seascape areas in the Northern Red Sea.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how reef-associated biodiversity responds to seascape features is essential for monitoring and conserving coral reef ecosystems. Environmental DNA (eDNA) from seawater provides access to benthopelagic eukaryotic diversity but its relationship with benthic structure remains poorly understood. We conducted simultaneous assessment of benthopelagic eDNA derived from near-reef seawater and benthic photoquadrat surveys across 12 coral reef sites in the northern Red Sea, spanning three seascape regions: the Gulf of Aqaba, nearshore Northern Red Sea (NRS), and offshore NRS. We examined whether spatial patterns in benthopelagic eDNA communities were structured across regions and whether variation in benthic cover explained differences in eDNA-derived assemblages obtained from water samples. Benthopelagic eDNA revealed fine-scale spatial structuring across regions but showed non-significant whole-community correlation with benthic composition. When examined by major taxonomic groups, taxon-specific relationships emerged, with some taxa (i.e., Micromonas sp.) showing increasing relative abundances in reefs characterized by lower benthic complexity. While traditional photoquadrat surveys captured 72 benthic sessile taxa including dominant benthic groups (e.g. hard corals and algae) across four eukaryotic phyla, benthopelagic eDNA documented a broader range of eukaryotic diversity, including planktonic, cryptic, and low abundant taxa spanning 35 phyla. Notably, eDNA detected cryptic organisms overlooked by visual surveys, such the giant clam Tridacna sp., even where present but not recorded in photoquadrats. Our results demonstrate that benthopelagic eDNA and visual surveys provide complementary perspectives on reef biodiversity. Rather than serving as a direct proxy for benthic structure, benthopelagic eDNA captures spatial and taxonomic patterns that may be overlooked by visual transects, supporting its use in seascape-scale biodiversity assessments and conservation planning efforts in dynamic and understudied reef systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.