Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41968143›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

YOLO based stubble burning detection system for Northern regions of India.

Harpreet Vohra, Saurabh Sharma, Rohit Arora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Harpreet VohraDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Punjab, India.
Saurabh SharmaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Punjab, India. saurabh.sharma@thapar.edu.
Rohit AroraDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stubble burning (SB) is a pervasive practice in Northern India, contributing significantly to winter air pollution, particularly exacerbated by the widespread use of combined harvesters. Despite its illegality, SB continues, releasing harmful pollutants and significantly deteriorating air quality. Recent advancements in computer vision, particularly those utilizing neural networks like YOLO, have significantly improved object detection capabilities. This paper proposes a novel approach to address this pressing issue by developing a cost-effective neural network-based fire and smoke detection model for an automated SB detection system. The proposed model is built upon YOLOv5 to efficiently detect the stubble burning: Architectural modifications of basic YOLOv5 are done by updating the Neck, Backbone and Head enhancing the feature extraction and object localization. We assess the model’s performance on our custom dataset using F-score, Mean Average Precision (mAP), and accuracy. Additionally, we perform an ablation study to examine the effects on inference time and mAP, as well as to evaluate the relationship between modal weights and processing speed.

Indexed as

Automated detection systemEnvironmental impactsNeural network-basedReal-time monitoringStubble burningYOLOv5

Identifiers

PMID41968143
PMCPMC13230678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.