ArticleScientific reports2026
Experimental verification of DAS vibration response characteristics of equal strength beam under sinusoidal excitation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) technology holds great potential for structural dynamic monitoring; however, its quantitative capability for complex dynamic strain fields and the reliability of spatial resolution require systematic verification. This study employed a systematic "theoretical modeling-simulation analysis-experimental verification" approach, using an equal-strength beam under sinusoidal excitation to investigate the dynamic response characteristics of DAS. A complete dynamic strain transfer model from external excitation to DAS phase-change signals was established, defining the phase sensitivity coefficient as a key parameter for quantitative analysis. Finite element simulations revealed that while the beam's strain is approximately uniform at low frequencies (< 5 Hz), it exhibits a gradient distribution-large near the fixed end and small near the free end-near the natural frequency, departing from the static "equal-strain" characteristic. Experimental results under 5 Hz excitation, utilizing synchronized measurements from accelerometers, FBG sensors, and DAS, demonstrated that DAS accurately captures the dominant vibration frequency. The measured phase sensitivity coefficient showed only a 7.3% error relative to theory, the response amplitude maintained high linearity with excitation and reference signals (R² ≥ 0.99), and the phase delay was negligible (0.02 rad). By incorporating the spatial averaging effect of the DAS gauge length, the theoretical strain ratio across channels is corrected, reducing the deviation from 23.4% to 1.7%, confirming DAS's ability to quantitatively resolve spatial differences in dynamic strain distribution. Additional 50 Hz experiments validate the frequency applicability threshold and demonstrate DAS's utility for event detection beyond the uniform-strain regime. Furthermore, by comparing DAS channel response ratios across spatial positions with theoretical strain ratios, the study confirmed DAS's ability to quantitatively resolve spatial differences in dynamic strain distribution. This work systematically validates the quantitative accuracy and reliability of DAS as a distributed dynamic strain sensing tool, and the revealed dynamic-static strain distribution differences, together with the established validation methodology, provide solid theoretical and experimental support for refined DAS-based monitoring in engineering structure dynamic monitoring scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.