Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41968122›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Ostrich egg shell as an accurate retrospective dosimeter using electron paramagnetic resonance technique.

E Aboelezz, M A Sharaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E AboelezzIonizing Radiation Metrology Department, National Institute of Standards (NIS), Giza, Egypt. eslam.aboelezz@nis.sci.eg.
M A SharafIonizing Radiation Metrology Department, National Institute of Standards (NIS), Giza, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the dosimetric features of Ostrich egg shell (Oesh) using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectroscopy to evaluate its potential as an accurate retrospective dosimeter. Key dosimetric characteristics, including sensitivity, dose-response, UV light effect, and temporal and thermal stability, were systematically evaluated. The EPR spectra of γ-irradiated samples revealed six radiation-induced signals (S₁–S₆) corresponding to biocarbonate radicals (CO₃⁻, CO₃³⁻, and CO₂⁻), with the dosimetric peak centered at g = 2.0040 ± 0.0016. The material exhibits a highly linear dose-response relationship in the range of 0.3 Gy to 1 kGy (R > 0.999). With a detection limit of 0.21 Gy, Oesh demonstrates significantly higher sensitivity than other egg shell dosimeters. The EPR signal remained stable after seven days of storage at ambient temperature with less than 18% fading depending on modulation amplitude value. Crucially, exposure to UVA and UVC light did not affect the γ-induced radicals, confirming the robustness of the dosimetric centers. The ratio of the dosimetric peaks S4 to (S4 + S5) exhibits a time-dependent decay that can be modeled to determine the elapsed time since irradiation. Furthermore, the measured energy dependence factor for Cs-137 (662 keV) is 1.01 relative to Co-60 (1250 keV), confirming the material’s reliability across relevant photon energies greater than 100 keV. These results establish Ostrich egg shell as a promising, highly sensitive, and stable material for both retrospective dosimetry and general radiation monitoring applications.

Indexed as

Egg ShellRadiometryStruthioniformesAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyGamma RaysUltraviolet RaysElectron paramagnetic resonanceEnergy dependenceHigh doseOstrich egg shellRetrospective dosimetry

Identifiers

PMID41968122
PMCPMC13077039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.