ArticleJournal of animal science2026
Particulate exposure during spermatogenesis is associated with adverse bull reproductive fitness in a wildfire impacted area.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wildfire-associated smoke has been increasing in frequency and severity in recent years in the western United States, posing complex health risks. In this study, we investigated the effects of smoke and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on sperm quality in a Colorado breeding facility bull population (n = 100), leveraging the facility's sample quality assessment records as a longitudinal data source. We focused on sperm viability as an outcome, using reproductive health records (February 2021-October 2023) to identify sperm sample dates and discard status, with 11,217 samples meeting inclusion criteria. For each preceding spermatogenesis period (61 d), we calculated median air pollution exposures (PM2.5, PM10, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and ozone) using proximate EPA monitors and a derived "smoke day" index integrating NOAA Hazard Mapping System smoke plumes with PM2.5 monitor data. We used three pairs (one each with and without interaction terms) of generalized linear mixed-effects models to predict sample discard probability and assess trend stability over increasingly complex air quality characterizations. We adjusted for bull age, two aggregate breed groups (specific to this study population and based on project partner guidance), and heat index, as well as individual bulls and collection date as random effects. Our best-performing model (per Akaike Information Criterion) found each additional smoke day increased discard odds by ∼4% (odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.05), with a nonsignificant primary PM2.5 effect but a significant breed interaction for ∼31% higher odds per additional 1-μg/m3 median PM2.5 (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15, 1.49) in Angus and Red Angus bulls. A model using only PM2.5 for air quality explained the most variance (R2) with a 1-μg/m3 increase raising sample discard odds by ∼7% (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01, 1.14) and a similar breed interaction effect (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15, 1.47). These findings help establish a baseline correlation between smoke and fine particulate matter exposure and reproductive fitness in bulls, with an apparent difference in vulnerability to PM2.5 across groups of related breeds. These results establish a baseline relationship that can begin to inform communication and risk mitigation strategies for cattlemen and veterinarians, and act as groundwork for future research into biological mechanisms and mitigation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.