SynthesisVox sanguinis2026
The efficacy of interactive communication interventions for motivating blood donation: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Vox sanguinis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe global blood product shortage is a persistent problem that urgently needs addressing. Research has investigated the effects of incentives, different interventions and different modes of communication on promoting blood donation; yet, there has been no systematic review comparing interactive communication-based interventions. Identifying effective methods to recruit and retain blood donors could inform future intervention design and improve resource allocation, thereby reducing strain on blood-product supply. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis review brings together relevant literature found on Medline, CENTRAL, Embase and PsychINFO to address the following questions: 'What are the most effective interactive interventions for promoting blood donation?' and 'Are these different between encouraging first-time and returning blood donors?' A total of 36 studies were included in this review.
resultsOverall, the quality of research on interactive communication-based interventions was poor, with several studies lacking sufficient detail to make clear conclusions. Evidence for three common interventions (phone calls, educational sessions and motivational interviews) was conflicting. Additionally, there was limited research into web-based interventions and recruitment of first-time donors.
conclusionReporting of communication interventions for blood donation could be improved, and our review suggests that a more heterogeneous approach to donor recruitment may be advantageous.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.