Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41968055›Full record

ArticleAustralian occupational therapy journal2026

Parental insights about supports for children with disabilities who are restricted eaters.

Rene Fraser, Kim Bulkeley, Rebecca Barton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rene FraserThe University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9337-6477
Kim BulkeleyThe University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7595-5624
Rebecca BartonThe University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5786-9864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRestricted eating-where children eat less than 30 foods, eliminate whole food groups, or avoid mealtimes-has far-reaching consequences beyond nutrition. Due to this complexity, parents may seek help from multiple health professionals. Although literature reports on various supports, there is limited understanding of parents' experiences. This research aims to explore parents' perspectives on supports provided to children with disabilities who have been identified as restricted eaters.

methodsA constructivist qualitative design with reflexive inductive thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with seven parents of children with restricted eating was employed. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: There was no consumer or community involvement in this study.

findingsParents described factors impacting access to services and a variety of supports that can be described on two axes: (a) focus of support and (b) responsiveness of support. Parents highlighted that supports on the more responsive end of the continuum-where clinicians acknowledged parental expertise, adapted strategies to individual child needs, and attended to family context-were perceived as more helpful. Conversely, rigid or prescriptive approaches were often experienced as misaligned with their child's needs, increasing parental stress and reducing perceived usefulness.

conclusionThe findings of this study highlight a need to critically appraise standardised structured approaches. Recommendations have been made to support shifts in practice towards services that are family-centred, focussed on capacity building, and promote responsive approaches to mealtimes.

Indexed as

Children with DisabilitiesFeeding BehaviorParentsSocial SupportAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative Researchcapacity buildingeatingfamily‐centred practicefussy eatingparentspicky eatingresponsive approaches

Identifiers

PMID41968055
PMCPMC13070736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.