Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41967977›Full record

Observational studyBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2026

Social Media and Supplements for Menopausal Symptoms: A Content Analysis.

Allison A Eubanks, Katerina Shvartsman

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Allison A EubanksDepartment of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2980-3857
Katerina ShvartsmanDepartment of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the role of social media in promoting menopause-related supplements and assess the evidence supporting their efficacy and safety.

designObservational content analysis.

settingPublic Instagram posts using menopause-related hashtags. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: A dataset of 1000 Instagram posts retrieved using 10 menopause-related hashtags.

methodsUsing a newly created Instagram account, we reviewed the top 100 posts from each of the 10 most popular menopause hashtags. Posts advertising branded oral supplements were categorized by poster type and message intent. The 20 most frequently promoted supplements were analyzed for active ingredients, monthly cost, and evidence-based efficacy. Data was collected in June 2024.

main outcome measuresPoster background, content category, ingredient profile, product cost, and safety and efficacy data.

resultsOf 1000 Instagram posts reviewed, 661 (66.1%) promoted branded menopause supplements. Only 18.3% were authored by credentialed clinicians, while most were posted by businesses (30.4%) or non-clinical individuals (51.3%). Among the top 20 advertised supplements, common ingredients such as black cohosh and chaste tree extract showed inconsistent evidence. Nearly half (45%) contained proprietary blends, limiting transparency. The average monthly cost was $43.49 (USD).

conclusionsMenopause supplement marketing on Instagram is dominated by non-clinicians and often lacks supporting evidence or regulatory oversight. Clinicians should be aware of this online landscape and address supplement use during patient consultations.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsMenopauseSocial MediaAdvertisingFemaleHumansMedia Exposureblack cohoshdietary supplementshormone therapyinstagrammenopausemisinformationpatient educationsocial mediasupplementswomen's health

Identifiers

PMID41967977
PMCPMC13485440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.