ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2026
Mesentery-Preserving Hand-Sewn Anastomosis for Rectal Endometriosis: A Nerve-Sparing Laparoscopic Technique.
Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo describe a mesentery-preserving, nerve-sparing laparoscopic technique for rectal endometriosis.
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingSingle centre. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Women requiring bowel resection for rectal endometriosis.
methodsFull-thickness anterior lesion excision and mesorectum-preserving limited posterior resection with hand-sewn anastomosis, compared with conventional stapled resection.
main outcome measuresAnastomotic integrity and 12-month functional outcomes.
resultsThe technique safely preserves neurovascular structures. Initial proof-of-concept data confirm surgical feasibility.
conclusionsThis approach is feasible and hypothesis-generating, supporting future prospective trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.