Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41967969›Full record

Trial reportTrends in hearing

Emotional Response to Pleasant Sounds Plays a Role in the Effectiveness of the Positive Focus Intervention.

Dina Lelic, Frederic Marmel, Mads Errboe Sørensen, Erin M Picou

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dina LelicORCA Labs, Lynge, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5818-2191
Frederic MarmelORCA Labs, Lynge, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7933-1798
Mads Errboe SørensenWSA, Lynge, Denmark.
Erin M PicouDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3083-0809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with hearing loss, even when using hearing aids, often perceive pleasant environmental sounds as less pleasant than do those with normal hearing. This bias in emotional response may negatively impact well-being, leading to decreased social participation and increased loneliness. The present study examined whether the Positive Focus intervention-encouraging hearing aid users to focus on positive listening experiences-could influence emotional response to environmental sounds. Thirty participants were randomly assigned to either a Positive Focus or a Control group. At the initial laboratory visit, all participants were fitted with study hearing aids and performed affective ratings of 120 environmental sounds. Over 3 weeks, both groups wore the hearing aids; the Positive Focus group additionally reported daily positive listening experiences via a text message. At the end of the three-week period, participants completed questionnaires on hearing aid outcomes and repeated the affective ratings. The Positive Focus intervention did not alter emotional responses to environmental sounds in a laboratory setting. However, regression analyses revealed that valence ratings of typically pleasant sounds moderated the effectiveness of Positive Focus on hearing aid benefit; the intervention was more effective for individuals less naturally inclined to respond positively to such sounds. These findings suggest that valence screening may help identify individuals most likely to benefit from Positive Focus, supporting more personalized hearing care strategies.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionCorrection of Hearing ImpairmentEmotionsHearing AidsHearing LossPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesAcoustic StimulationAgedAged, 80 and overAuditory AcuityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSurveys and Questionnaireshearing aid benefithearing aidshearing aid satisfactionhearing losspositive focusvalence

Identifiers

PMID41967969
PMCPMC13080153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.