Observational studyEndocrine journal2026
Endocrine disorders in pediatric medulloblastoma survivors treated with X-ray or proton beam therapy: a single-institution retrospective study.
Observational study in Endocrine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medulloblastoma, a common pediatric central nervous system disease, is managed with surgery, chemotherapy, and craniospinal irradiation (CSI) delivered with either X-rays or protons. Proton-beam CSI, introduced to protect the surrounding tissues, may reduce endocrine toxicity. In this single-institution retrospective observational study, we evaluated adverse endocrine events in 14 patients diagnosed with medulloblastoma before 13 years of age: 9 and 5 received X-ray and proton beam CSI, respectively. In the X-ray therapy group, the median age at diagnosis was 4.2 (range: 1.4-12.5) years, the median post-radiation follow-up was 19.5 (9.7-34.7) years, and the median CSI dose was 25.2 (23.4-36.0) Gy. The proton beam therapy group showed corresponding medians of 9.4 (5.3-11.7) years, 6.9 (5.4-8.1) years, and 23.4 (23.4-36.0) Gy. Five years after radiation therapy completion, the incidence of growth hormone deficiency was 44% (4/9) and 60% (3/5) in the X-ray and proton beam therapy groups, respectively. However, primary hypothyroidism and central hypothyroidism were exclusively observed in the X-ray therapy group, in 33% (3/9) and 11% (1/9) of patients. Given the short follow-up period for the proton beam therapy group, the difference in the occurrence rates of gonadal dysfunction and adrenal insufficiency is currently unknown. Our findings suggest that, at ≤5 years after the completion of radiation therapy, radiation-induced hypothyroidism was observed only in patients treated with X-ray therapy and not in those treated with proton beam therapy. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up periods are required to clarify this possible advantage and to refine radiation therapy protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.