ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2026
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement: Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Between the David and Yacoub Procedure in Denmark.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe study aimed to compare long-term outcomes of the David and Yacoub valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) procedures in a nationwide, low-volume setting.
methodsAll patients undergoing elective VSARR in Denmark between January 2010 and April 2022 were identified using the Danish registries. The primary end-point was all-cause death. Secondary end-points included stroke, reoperation, a composite of death or reoperation, and long-term echocardiographic outcomes. Analyses were performed in both crude and propensity score-matched (PSM) populations and compared with outcomes from a control group comprised of all elective composite root replacement procedures performed at the contributing centres in the study period.
resultsA total of 160 patients underwent VSARR (median age; David vs Yacoub; 49.7 [SD 14.1] years vs 51.5 [SD 14.3] years; P = .42) with the David (n = 92, 57.5%; median follow-up 8.2 [SD 3.6] years) or Yacoub (n = 68, 42.5%; median follow-up 7.1 [SD 2.4] years) procedure. Ten-year all-cause death was similar (David 9.3% [95% CI: 2.3-15.2] vs Yacoub 8.8% [95% CI: 3.6-20.6]; log-rank P = .54). Reoperation rates (log-rank P = .12), stroke incidence (P = .41), and the composite end-point of death or reoperation (log-rank P = .63) were comparable, with consistent findings in the PSM cohort. Long-term echocardiographic follow-up demonstrated no difference in recurrent regurgitation, stenosis, or valve-related complications. Compared to elective composite root replacement (CRR) (n = 486), VSARR demonstrated lower rate of all-cause death (P = .027) and stroke (P = .026), while reoperation rate was higher (13.8% vs 4.3%; P < .001). However, the risk of reoperation was comparable between procedures when accounting for competing risk of death (log-rank P = .17).
conclusionsLong-term outcomes following elective VSARR using the David and Yacoub procedure were comparable. VSARR was associated with lower risk of all-cause death and stroke compared to elective CRR, supporting the two VSARR procedures as durable options when performed in experienced centres with careful patient selection, even in low-volume settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.