ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
Patterns of Conservation and Loss of Hox Genes in Xenacoelomorph Lineage Since Divergence From Last Common Bilaterian Ancestor.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The explosion of body forms found in bilaterians is thought to be tied to the diversification of Hox transcription factors, which play a critical role in development along the anterior-posterior axis for most bilaterians. However, the evolutionary history of Hox genes in Bilateria's early branches remains unclear. Xenacoelomorpha, a clade of marine worms including Xenoturbella and the acoelomorphs Acoela and Nemertodermatida, have a simple Hox complement and are a particular group of interest. Past surveys of Hox in Xenacoelomorpha have been taxonomically limited. To address this, we analyze the homeodomains and surrounding amino acid motifs coded by Hox, ParaHox, and extended Hox genes across 40 xenacoelomorph transcriptomes and four genomes, along with representatives of other major bilaterian groups and the anthozoan Nematostella vectensis. We show that several motif annotations previously proposed to be synapomorphies of Acoela are ubiquitous across both Xenacoelomorpha and the rest of Bilateria and found new Hox content specific to Acoela and Xenoturbella. Our results reveal homology between xenacoelomorph antHox and other bilaterian Hox1 genes, though the relationships of centHox and postHox genes remain unresolved either due to rapid sequence evolution or extensive birth-death processes. Our analyses suggest that diversification of bilaterian Hox involved both extensive retention and loss of ancestral content. Hox variability between xenacoelomorphs and other bilaterians reflects selective retention of ancestral Hox content rather than affinity to either deuterostomes or protostomes and does not remove support from a monophyletic Xenacoelomorpha sister group to all other Bilateria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.