Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41967468›Full record

ReviewGenome biology and evolution2026

The Use of dN/dS Ratios to Investigate Types of Selection in Related Sexual and Asexual Lineages.

Finn L Klemp, Elvira Hörandl, Mark Maraun, Stefan Scheu, Bastian Heimburger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Finn L KlempAnimal Ecology, JFB Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-3897-516X
Elvira HörandlDepartment of Systematics, Biodiversity and Evolution of Plants (with Herbarium), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7600-1128
Mark MaraunAnimal Ecology, JFB Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2736-8548
Stefan ScheuAnimal Ecology, JFB Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4350-9520
Bastian HeimburgerAnimal Ecology, JFB Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2302-019X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing availability of whole-genome assemblies, interest in the genomic consequences of diverse reproductive modes has grown. Reduced efficiency of selection in asexually reproducing species is often cited as a major consequence and is frequently investigated using the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS). However, many studies do not give sufficient attention to the fundamental differences between nonsexual reproductive modes, which likely have substantial effects on the efficiency of selection. We reviewed studies that compared dN/dS ratios of sexual and asexual relatives across 20 taxa. Asexual reproductive modes were classified into two categories: Meiosis without interchromosomal mixis (automixis and premeiotic doubling), i.e. modified meiosis that restores ploidy without outcrossing, and apomixis, i.e. production of unreduced eggs that develop without meiosis and without interchromosomal or intrachromosomal mixis. We further included two modes of reproduction which are not sexual and not strictly asexual, but may be seen as such at first glance: Fissiparity/clonal growth, i.e. the formation of new modules/ramets by splitting of somatic tissue without meiosis or mixis, and selfing, i.e. meiosis followed by fertilization of the gametes by the same individual. Consistent with theory, fissiparous lineages generally exhibited elevated dN/dS ratios, whereas automicts and apomicts showed no consistent pattern, even among taxa with identical reproductive modes. We discuss limitations of commonly used phylogenetic analyses using maximum likelihood (PAML) branch and branch-site models, which can obscure subtle differences, and propose different avenues to assess detection of selection. We propose that the heterogeneous patterns in asexual lineages reflect lineage-specific consequences of asexuality, model limitations, and our incomplete understanding of cytological mechanisms underlying different nonsexual reproductive modes.

Indexed as

Reproduction, AsexualSelection, GeneticSilent MutationAnimalsEvolution, MolecularMeiosisPhylogenyasexualityclonal growthcodon evolutiondN/dS ratiosselfingsexuality

Identifiers

PMID41967468
PMCPMC13134044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.