ReviewGenome biology and evolution2026
The Use of dN/dS Ratios to Investigate Types of Selection in Related Sexual and Asexual Lineages.
Review in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Telomere biology and telomerase regulation across species: evolutionary insights into aging, longevity, and genome stability.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increasing availability of whole-genome assemblies, interest in the genomic consequences of diverse reproductive modes has grown. Reduced efficiency of selection in asexually reproducing species is often cited as a major consequence and is frequently investigated using the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS). However, many studies do not give sufficient attention to the fundamental differences between nonsexual reproductive modes, which likely have substantial effects on the efficiency of selection. We reviewed studies that compared dN/dS ratios of sexual and asexual relatives across 20 taxa. Asexual reproductive modes were classified into two categories: Meiosis without interchromosomal mixis (automixis and premeiotic doubling), i.e. modified meiosis that restores ploidy without outcrossing, and apomixis, i.e. production of unreduced eggs that develop without meiosis and without interchromosomal or intrachromosomal mixis. We further included two modes of reproduction which are not sexual and not strictly asexual, but may be seen as such at first glance: Fissiparity/clonal growth, i.e. the formation of new modules/ramets by splitting of somatic tissue without meiosis or mixis, and selfing, i.e. meiosis followed by fertilization of the gametes by the same individual. Consistent with theory, fissiparous lineages generally exhibited elevated dN/dS ratios, whereas automicts and apomicts showed no consistent pattern, even among taxa with identical reproductive modes. We discuss limitations of commonly used phylogenetic analyses using maximum likelihood (PAML) branch and branch-site models, which can obscure subtle differences, and propose different avenues to assess detection of selection. We propose that the heterogeneous patterns in asexual lineages reflect lineage-specific consequences of asexuality, model limitations, and our incomplete understanding of cytological mechanisms underlying different nonsexual reproductive modes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.