ArticlePoultry science2026
Effects of different blending ratios of lard and chicken fat on growth performance, nutrient utilization, serum lipid metabolism, and tissue fatty acid composition in meat ducks.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of lard and chicken fat blending ratios on growth performance, nutrient availability, serum lipid metabolism, and tissue fatty acid composition in meat ducks aged 14 to 42 days. A total of 480 14-day-old meat ducks were randomly divided into 6 treatment groups (8 replicates per group, 10 ducks per replicate), with a total dietary fat addition level of 7.5 %. The dietary ratios of lard to chicken fat were 100:0 (T1), 80:20 (T2), 60:40 (T3), 40:60 (T4), 20:80 (T5), and 0:100 (T6). Results showed that the T3 group (60:40) achieved the lowest feed-to-gain ratio, which significantly outperformed (P < 0.05) the pure lard (T1), pure chicken fat (T6), and high-chicken fat groups (T4,T5). Meanwhile, the DM and phosphorus availability in the T3 group were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those in all other groups and the gross energy utilization as well as AME in the T3 group were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those in the T1 and high-chicken fat groups (T4-T6). Serum lipid homeostasis was optimized in the T3 group, maintaining the lowest total cholesterol and LDL-C levels (P < 0.05). Fatty acid profiling revealed distinct metabolic partitioning: while leg muscle and subcutaneous fat displayed a sensitive "dietary mirroring" effect, breast muscle maintained lipid homeostasis. These results suggested that the 60:40 lard-to-chicken fat blend constitutes the optimal lipid strategy, which potentially enhances feed efficiency and mineral absorption and optimized systemic lipid clearance and tissue lipid deposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.