ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Comparative phenotypic analysis of rhodopsin supports stepwise evolution of dim-light vision in early vertebrates.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The origin of dim-light vision in vertebrates has been attributed to an early duplication event in an ancestral form of pigment called RH, which led to the formation of the RH1 (rhodopsin) and RH2 (rhodopsin-like) opsins. Two sites (122 and 189) are known to critically underlie rhodopsin's sensitivity in low light; however, the evolutionary trajectory leading to dim-light vision remains unclear. We built a large comparative dataset of vertebrate RH1 and RH2 sequences and inferred their respective ancestral protein sequences alongside their common ancestor. Sequence comparisons revealed that known critical sites underpinning RH1 kinetics did not evolve at the origin of this molecule, and instead first evolved in RH (M122E) as well as later in the RH1 of ancestor of jawed vertebrates (P189I). To assess the phenotypic impacts of these changes, we conducted in vitro protein expression and found that the retinal release rate of RH1 became significantly slower following its divergence from RH2, with further deceleration at the origin of jawed vertebrates. We also constructed single RH1 mutants and found that the replacement S295A accounted for the observed difference in retinal release between RH and RH1. Finally, to validate these phenotypic consequences in vivo, we compared zebrafish overexpressing RH, RH1, or the mutant RH-S295A, and recorded increased locomotor rebound following light-intensity reduction in the latter two treatments. We conclude that highly sensitive dim-light vision in vertebrates evolved via three main stages of molecular adaptation, at the origins of RH and RH1, and subsequently in the ancestral RH1 of jawed vertebrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.