Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41967114›Full record

SynthesisInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2026

Perioperative Outcomes of Complex Versus Simple Segmentectomy Via Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mohamed Elshiekh, Laith Altawil, Mohamed Yaseen Alfeetouri, Felipe Passos, Osama Barakat, Samuel Heuts, Setu Gupta, Massimo Baudo, Arian Arjomandi Rad, Peyman Sardari Nia and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mohamed ElshiekhFaculty of Medicine, University of Gezira, Wad Madani, Al-Jezira State, 5118 40466, Sudan.ORCID 0009-0006-5507-5714
Laith AltawilDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UB9 6JH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0001-4907-3791
Mohamed Yaseen AlfeetouriFaculty of Medicine, University of Benghazi, Benghazi, Libya.ORCID 0009-0004-5863-3932
Felipe PassosDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, MaterDei Hospital, Salvador, Bahia, 40.220-005, Brazil.
Osama BarakatFaculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo, Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic.ORCID 0009-0006-3465-3044
Samuel HeutsDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HX, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3531-9997
Setu GuptaBrunel Medical School, Brunel University London, London, England, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0008-5514-5297
Massimo BaudoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery Research, Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Main Line Health, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3754-6704
Arian Arjomandi RadDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
Peyman Sardari NiaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HX, The Netherlands.
Muhammed ElhadiCollege of Medicine, Korea University, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6406-4212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) has been increasingly adopted for anatomical segmentectomy because of its minimally invasive nature and favourable recovery profile. However, whether perioperative outcomes differ between complex and simple segmentectomy when performed via U-VATS remains uncertain. This study compared perioperative outcomes between complex and simple U-VATS segmentectomy.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2 guidelines, and the study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251151464). Six databases were searched for studies comparing complex and simple U-VATS segmentectomy for pulmonary lesions. Primary outcomes were operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and conversion to thoracotomy. Secondary outcomes included chest tube duration, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Random-effects models were used for pooled analyses.

resultsFive retrospective studies, including 1051 patients (707 complex; 344 simple), were analysed. No statistically significant differences were detected in operative time (MD = 15.25 min, 95% CI: -1.25 to 31.75; P = .07; I2 = 88%), intraoperative blood loss (MD = -1.33 mL, 95% CI: -11.95 to 9.29; P = .81; I2 = 58%), or conversion to thoracotomy (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.10-1.99; P = .30; I2 = 0%). Secondary outcomes also showed no significant differences, including chest tube duration (MD = -0.15 days, 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.11; P = .25; I2 = 26%), hospital stay (MD = -0.16 days, 95% CI: -0.73 to 0.40; P = .57; I2 = 66%).

conclusionsNo statistically significant differences were detected in key perioperative outcomes between complex and simple U-VATS segmentectomy; however, given substantial clinical heterogeneity and limited retrospective evidence, findings should be interpreted cautiously and are most applicable to selected patients treated in experienced, high-volume centres.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPneumonectomyThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsTreatment Outcomecomplex segmentectomymeta-analysissimple segmentectomysystematic reviewuniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID41967114
PMCPMC13167022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.