Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41967103›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2026

Identification of Hidden Cachexia Subgroup in PD-L1-High NSCLC: Comparative Analysis of the AWGC vs. Fearon Criteria.

Naoya Nishioka, Hayato Kawachi, Tadaaki Yamada, Motohiro Tamiya, Yoshiki Negi, Yasuhiro Goto, Akira Nakao, Shinsuke Shiotsu, Keiko Tanimura, Takayuki Takeda and 11 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Naoya NishiokaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6938-4976
Hayato KawachiDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Tadaaki YamadaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6945-281X
Motohiro TamiyaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshiki NegiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Hematology, School of Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
Yasuhiro GotoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Akira NakaoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Nanakuma, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shinsuke ShiotsuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Keiko TanimuraDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Takayuki TakedaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Asuka OkadaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Saiseikai Suita Hospital, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Taishi HaradaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, Fukuchiyama, Kyoto, Japan.
Koji DateDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Kyoto Chubu Medical Center, Nantan, Kyoto, Japan.
Yusuke ChiharaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Uji-Tokushukai Medical Center, Uji, Kyoto, Japan.
Isao HasegawaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Saiseikai Shiga Hospital, Ritto, Shiga, Japan.
Nobuyo TamiyaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Takeo OgawaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Masahiro IwasakuDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Shinsaku TokudaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Takashi KijimaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Hematology, School of Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
Koichi TakayamaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer cachexia, frequently observed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, is associated with reduced immunotherapy efficacy and poor prognosis. Despite the Fearon criteria being widely used to define cachexia, its relevance in Asian populations remains uncertain. Recently, the Asian Working Group for Cachexia (AWGC) proposed novel diagnostic criteria adapted for Asian body compositions. However, it remains unclear whether the outcomes or predictive value for immunotherapy differ between the AWGC and Fearon definitions. In addition, the AWGC-specific cachexia subgroup, previously regarded as noncachexia under Fearon's definition, has not been fully characterized.

methodsWe retrospectively analysed 411 Japanese patients with advanced PD-L1-high non-small cell lung cancer who received first-line PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy. Survival outcomes and clinical and nutritional indices were compared using both the AWGC and Fearon criteria. The patients were subsequently classified into three groups: (1) noncachexia, (2) A-only cachexia (meeting only the AWGC criteria), and (3) A+F cachexia (meeting both criteria). The small subgroup meeting only Fearon's criteria (n = 13) was excluded from analysis.

resultsPer the AWGC definition, 168 patients (40.9%) were classified as having cachexia compared to 62 (15.1%) according to the Fearon definition. AWGC-defined cachexia was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (18.2 vs. 48.5 months, adjusted HR 1.539, p = 0.003), while progression-free survival (PFS) under PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy or chemoimmunotherapy showed a nonsignificant trend (7.1 vs. 13.0 months, adjusted HR 1.253, p = 0.072). Fearon-defined cachexia similarly predicted worse OS (18.4 vs. 37.7 months, adjusted HR 1.743, p = 0.002) but not PFS (5.9 vs. 11.4 months, adjusted HR 1.326, p = 0.081). In the three-group comparisons, the A-only cachexia group (n = 119) showed intermediate characteristics: Compared with the noncachexia group, they had lower BMI, higher C-reactive protein and poorer nutritional indices (prognostic nutritional and geriatric nutritional risk indices); compared with the A+F cachexia group, they had higher BMI, lower C-reactive protein and better nutritional indices. The PFS in the A-only cachexia group was comparable with that in the noncachexia group; however, the OS was significantly shorter (21.8 vs. 48.5 months, p = 0.0002). Compared with the A+F cachexia group, the A-only cachexia group showed no significant differences but demonstrated a favourable trend toward better PFS (adjusted HR 0.72, p = 0.096) and OS (adjusted HR 0.66, p = 0.051).

conclusionThe AWGC and Fearon criteria demonstrated comparable prognostic values. The A-only cachexia subgroup, previously regarded as noncachexia, retained responsiveness to immunotherapy but exhibited significantly shorter survival, underscoring its clinical relevance as a previously unrecognized at-risk group.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenCachexiaCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansImmunotherapyMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanAsian working group for cachexiacachexiafearon criteriaimmunotherapynon‐small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID41967103
PMCPMC13070542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.