ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes in CIED-related vs. left-sided infective endocarditis: a nationwide study from the NIDUS registry.
Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insulin-treated type 2 diabetes is associated with increased mortality after transvenous lead extraction for device infection: the IN2DEEP study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsCardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infective endocarditis (IE) presents distinct diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to its unique characteristics and limited evidence supporting guidelines compared with left-sided valvular IE. We aimed to examine clinical characteristics, treatment, and mortality in patients with CIED-related IE vs. left-sided valvular IE. METHODS AND
resultsWe included patients with first-time IE using nationwide data from the NatIonal Danish endocarditis StUdieS (NIDUS) registry (2016-2021) and categorized them into isolated CIED-related IE without concomitant valvular IE and left-sided valvular IE. A total of 340 patients with isolated CIED-related IE and 2510 patients with left-sided IE were included. Patients with CIED-related IE vs. left-sided IE were older (76.1 vs. 73.2 years), and a higher proportion were males (78.5% vs. 65.9%), had diabetes (32.9% vs. 21.9%), heart failure (46.2% vs. 11.7%), Staphylococcus aureus (37.1% vs. 30.7%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (11.2% vs. 6.4%), and culture-negative IE (12.1% vs. 7.8%). However, fever at admission was lower in CIED-related IE (55.4% vs. 61.5%). Cardiac implantable electronic device removal was performed in 78.2% of patients with CIED-related IE. The 6-month cumulative incidence of mortality was 20.4% (95% CI: 16.2-24.9%) in CIED-related IE and 26.8% (95% CI: 25.1-28.6%) in left-sided IE (P = 0.009). In a multivariable Cox regression model, CIED-related IE was associated with lower 6-month mortality compared with left-sided IE (adjusted HR: 0.52 [95% CI: 0.40-0.68], P < 0.001).
conclusionIn this nationwide study, patients with CIED-related IE were distinctly different from those with left-sided IE. Staphylococci were more prevalent, and despite higher age and differences in comorbidities, mortality was lower.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.