GuidelineEuropean heart journal2026
Cardiac evaluation of paediatric athletes.
Guideline in European heart journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chief medical officers' perceptions of athlete cardiac screening.JSAMS plus · 2026Article
- Greater weekly exercise volume is associated with lower prevalence of metabolic comorbidities, psychiatric conditions, and exertional symptoms in youth athletes undergoing pre-participation screening: an observational study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Paediatric athletes are not simply 'mini adults'. Most existing recommendations for cardiac screening in paediatric athletes are primarily based on evidence in adults and are designed for adult athletes. Paediatric-specific recommendations are needed due to the specifics of cardiac physiology, maturation and growth, age-related disease expression, modified diagnostic pathways, training adaptations, and to address relevant ethical considerations. This clinical consensus document from the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) of the ESC and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) introduces specific advice for paediatric athletes for the first time, based on expert consensus, and where available, data from paediatric athlete populations. Members of the writing group voted anonymously on key advice statements, with ≥80% agreement required for consensus. All advice in this document applies to paediatric athletes aged <16 years, including those under 12 years of age. This document advises that cardiac screening of paediatric athletes with personal and family medical history, physical examination and 12-lead resting electrocardiogram (ECG) should be performed and should start no later than the age of 12 years. Implementing a screening programme requires ensuring the availability of necessary healthcare resources. One transthoracic echocardiogram may be appropriate to identify high-risk structural cardiac diseases not identifiable on ECG, provided appropriate infrastructure for baseline diagnostic assessments is in place. This document also includes suggested definitions of normal, borderline and abnormal ECG findings in paediatric athletes. Detailed advice is provided for further evaluation if suspicious findings are identified on initial tests. This document highlights that further research is required to optimise screening strategies, accurately assess and quantify the risk of sudden cardiac death and provide evidence-based eligibility recommendations for paediatric athletes with cardiac disease. It is also noted that increased opportunities for paediatric sports cardiology training are required to provide adequate medical care for the paediatric athlete population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.