Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41967025›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2026

The prevalence, nature and trajectory of oropharyngeal dysphagia within the first year following curative open resection for esophageal cancer.

Michelle Hayes, Anna Gillman, Jessie A Elliott, Claire L Donohoe, John V Reynolds, Julie Regan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michelle HayesDepartment of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7996-8561
Anna GillmanDepartment of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9376-6130
Jessie A ElliottDepartment of Surgery, St. James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4673-0386
Claire L DonohoeDepartment of Surgery, St. James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9373-2662
John V ReynoldsDepartment of Surgery, St. James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5501-9521
Julie ReganDepartment of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5816-4516

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the absence of a mechanical stricture, oropharyngeal dysphagia following esophageal cancer surgery, and swallowing physiology more broadly, is poorly understood. This study investigated oropharyngeal dysphagia within the first year following curative open esophageal resection. A prospective cohort study was conducted (January 2022 to January 2024) at the National Esophageal Cancer Centre in Ireland. Participants were recruited between 6 to 12 months post-esophagectomy. A standardized videofluoroscopy was completed. Outcome measures included the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGESTv2), Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP), and Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS). Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) was used to identify oral intake status. To evaluate the trajectory of oropharyngeal dysphagia, long-term data were compared to previously published acute data findings. Seventeen participants (12 males; mean age 65 years, range 46-80) were included. The cohort comprised transthoracic (2-stage n = 7, 3-stage n = 3) and transhiatal (n = 7) resections. 11 participants (65%) had persistent oropharyngeal dysphagia (DIGESTv2), and 2 (12%) continued to aspirate greater than 6-months, both of whom had a transhiatal resection. 10 (59%) continued to modify their diet (abnormal FOIS <7). MBSImP revealed impaired initiation of swallow (82%), anterior hyoid excursion (82%), tongue base retraction (100%), pharyngeal residue (100%) and neo-esophageal clearance (82%). When comparing acute to longer term data, there was a statistically significant difference in aspiration based on PAS (P = 0.016), but not dysphagia based on the DIGESTv2 (P = 0.500). Oropharyngeal dysphagia is prevalent within the first year following open esophageal cancer surgery. The study informs the need for structured guidelines and a swallowing care pathway.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overDeglutitionFemaleFluoroscopyHumansIrelandMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceProspective StudiesTime Factorsesophageal cancer surgeryesophagectomyhealth-related quality of lifeoropharyngeal dysphagia

Identifiers

PMID41967025
PMCPMC13070386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.