SynthesisClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026
Mastitis as a risk factor for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women worldwide, accounting for more than 2.3 million new cases annually. Although chronic inflammation is a well-established risk factor for cancer, the association between mastitis and BC has not yet been clearly established. Therefore, this study aims to investigate mastitis as a potential risk factor for BC.
methodsWe performed a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR). P values lower than 0.05 were considered statistically significant, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical analyses were conducted using R Studio software version 4.4.2, considering P < 0.05 as statistically significant.
resultsOur meta-analysis included 54,216 patients, of whom 18,753 (34.6%) had mastitis, while 35,463 (65.4%) comprised the control group. Our results support that the risk of BC is higher among patients with a history of mastitis (OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.44-3.11; p = 0.0423). Similarly, longitudinal analysis based on total follow-up also confirmed an increased risk of BC in the mastitis group (HR: 2.0057; 95% CI: 1.1739-3.4269; p = 0.011).
conclusionThis meta-analysis highlights a possible association between the presence of mastitis and BC, substantially contributing to the advancement of understanding regarding risk factors for this cancer. Prospective studies using robust detection methods and paired tissue analyses are needed to confirm these findings and clarify the role of mastitis in breast tumorigenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.