Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41966663›Full record

ArticleAmbio2026

Assessing scaling strategies for nature-based solutions: An indicator-based analysis of policy documents in the Canary Islands.

M Susana Orta-Ortiz, Davide Geneletti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M Susana Orta-OrtizPlanning for Ecosystem Services and Urban Sustainability Lab, Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Via Mesiano, 77, 38123, Trento, Italy.
Davide GenelettiPlanning for Ecosystem Services and Urban Sustainability Lab, Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Via Mesiano, 77, 38123, Trento, Italy. davide.geneletti@unitn.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5528-3365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As nature-based solutions (NBS) gain momentum in global and EU agendas for climate, biodiversity, and societal challenges, a key question is how to scale them beyond isolated interventions. This study examines three complementary scaling strategies: scaling-out (spatial expansion), scaling-up (institutional adoption), and scaling-deep (cultural integration), within the Canary Islands' multi-level governance system. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of 23 policy documents, identifying 445 NBS proposals across four intervention types and 14 ecosystem-based sub-types. These proposals were assessed using 11 quantitative indicators that measure spatial distribution, governance and sectoral integration, and decision-makers' values. Findings show uneven progress across strategies. Scaling out is the most advanced. Scaling up is constrained by limited actor diversity and weak collaborations, although municipal actors show bottom-up potential. Scaling deep is least developed, with multifunctional design rare and isolated. Collaborative proposals address a few goals, limiting multifunctionality. We conclude with practical and research directions to strengthen interconnections among scaling strategies.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmental PolicyBiodiversitySpainCitiesEcosystem servicesSpatial planningSustainability transitionTransformative change

Identifiers

PMID41966663
PMCPMC13437867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.