ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Trusted polyp segmentation via multi-scale evidence ensemble in colonoscopy images.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAccurate and reliable polyp segmentation is essential for early colorectal cancer detection. Although recent methods employing multi-scale feature aggregation have achieved high accuracy, their reliability in challenging clinical scenarios remains insufficient. Existing uncertainty-aware approaches primarily estimate uncertainty only at the decision layer, failing to exploit multi-scale trustworthiness across the network.
methodsWe propose an end-to-end trusted polyp segmentation (TPS) framework based on a multi-scale evidence ensemble. TPS unifies uncertainty estimation and segmentation optimization at the evidence level via Dempster-Shafer theory. Evidence is parameterized with a Dirichlet distribution to explicitly estimate uncertainty at each prediction scale. An uncertainty-embedded attention module is developed to refine polyp delineation using fused multi-scale uncertainty maps. Furthermore, an asymmetric Dice loss is introduced to emphasize error-prone regions dynamically revealed by uncertainty estimates.
resultsExperiments on four public datasets demonstrate consistent performance gains. TPS achieves the best results on CVC-ClinicDB (mDice = 93.32 ± 0.17) and Kvasir (mDice = 91.95 ± 0.34), and substantially improves performance on the challenging CVC-ColonDB and ETIS datasets, achieving the highest mDice across all benchmarks. In particular, TPS produces more calibrated uncertainty estimates, indicating improved reliability in challenging colonoscopy images.
conclusionTPS introduces a new paradigm that integrates uncertainty estimation and segmentation optimization at the evidence level. By providing more precise and trustworthy predictions, TPS offers strong potential for safer and more reliable assistance in clinical colonoscopy procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41966652What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.