ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2026
Impact of TOPAZ-1 eligibility on the survival benefit of durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer: a multicenter real-world study.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDurvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin (GCD) has become a standard first-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) following the TOPAZ-1 trial. However, whether the survival benefit observed in trial-eligible patients can be generalized to broader real-world populations remains uncertain. We evaluated the impact of TOPAZ-1 eligibility on the effectiveness of GCD in routine clinical practice.
methodsIn this multicenter retrospective cohort study, 610 patients with unresectable or recurrent BTC treated with first-line GCD (n = 268) or gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) (n = 342) at 19 Japanese institutions were analyzed. Patients were classified according to TOPAZ-1 eligibility criteria. Overall survival (OS) was compared between treatment groups in the entire cohort and stratified by eligibility status. Multivariable Cox models were constructed separately for eligible and ineligible patients.
resultsAmong 610 patients, 324 (53.1%) met TOPAZ-1 eligibility criteria. In the overall cohort, GCD was associated with longer OS than GC (median, 13.7 vs 11.3 months; p = 0.009). Among eligible patients, GCD significantly improved OS compared with GC (18.0 vs 13.1 months; p = 0.004), whereas no significant difference was observed among ineligible patients (10.8 vs 10.0 months; p = 0.675). However, the interaction between treatment and TOPAZ-1 eligibility was not statistically significant (p for interaction = 0.162).
conclusionsIn this real-world cohort, the survival benefit of GCD appeared to be primarily observed in patients meeting TOPAZ-1 eligibility criteria. Trial-based eligibility may influence the magnitude of benefit from immunochemotherapy in advanced BTC, underscoring the importance of patient selection in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.