Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41966636›Full record

ArticleOdontology2026

Prompt engineering shapes diagnostic accuracy and explanation quality of LLM in oral lesion diagnosis: a prospective, expert-blinded benchmark study.

Fatma E A Hassanein, Suzan S Ibrahim, Saygo Tomo, Abdulaziz Alsahhaf, Asmaa Abou-Bakr

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Adverse Oral Mucosal Reaction to Sublingual Captopril: A Case Report With Exploratory Insights Into AI-Assisted Clinical Reasoning.Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry
    Article
  3. Adverse Oral Mucosal Reaction to Sublingual Captopril: A Case Report With Exploratory Insights Into AI-Assisted Clinical Reasoning.Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fatma E A HassaneinOral Medicine, Periodontology, and Oral Diagnosis, Faculty of Dentistry, King Salman International University, El Tur, South Sinai, Egypt.
Suzan S IbrahimOral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Saygo TomoDepartment of Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Abdulaziz AlsahhafDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Asmaa Abou-BakrOral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Galala University, Suez, Egypt. asmaa.abdalraouf@gu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5069-8257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate how different prompting strategies influence the diagnostic accuracy, stability, and interpretability of a multimodal large language model (LLM) (ChatGPT-5.1) in oral lesion assessment and to introduce the Prompt Performance Index (PPI), a novel robustness metric that quantifies the performance stability across clinically relevant subgroups. A total of 300 biopsy-confirmed clinical vignettes were assessed using three distinct prompting strategies: a Context-Focused Prompt (CFP), an Evidence-Guided Prompt (EGP), and a Consistency-Optimized Prompt (COP). Diagnostic accuracy (Top-1 and Top-3), confidence calibration, explanation quality, and computational efficiency were compared. The PPI, defined as mean diagnostic accuracy penalized by variability across subgroups, was developed to characterize robustness across diagnostic difficulty tiers and lesion categories. Multivariable regression models examined the independent effects of prompt structure, case difficulty, and lesion type. COP achieved the highest numerical Top-1 accuracy (72.0%) and the greatest performance stability across difficulty levels and lesion categories. Confidence calibration and explanation quality were also superior for COP (p < 0.0001). Multivariable regression analysis confirmed that both prompt design and diagnostic difficulty significantly influenced model accuracy. The PPI differentiated prompting strategies by revealing variation in diagnostic performance stability not captured by accuracy metrics alone, with COP yielding the highest PPI values under both Top-1 and Top-3 performance. Prompt engineering meaningfully affects multimodal LLM diagnostic behavior in oral medicine. The proposed PPI provides a novel and clinically interpretable framework for evaluating diagnostic robustness across heterogeneous clinical conditions, complementing conventional accuracy-based assessments and enabling more dependable diagnostic workflows with AI assistance.

Indexed as

Diagnostic accuracyLarge language modelsOral lesionsPrompt engineeringRobustness

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.