Observational studyThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2026
Structural social factors modify the association between Alzheimer's pathology and cognitive function.
Observational study in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial factors have been linked to cognitive decline and risk of dementia. However, our understanding of their impact on cognition in the context of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology is still limited.
objectivesThis study examined whether two structural social factors, relationship status (RS) and living situation (LS), modify the association between AD pathology and cognition.
designObservational, analysis of existing cohort data.
settingData were obtained from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and the Imaging Dementia-Evidence for Amyloid Scanning (IDEAS) study.
participantsParticipants with available data on cognitive performance, AD pathology, and structural social factors. MEASUREMENTS: We used the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), a widely used brief screening measure of global cognitive status. For the description of AD, postmortem neuropathology (NACC) reports, or amyloid PET (IDEAS) were used. RS and LS were coded according to the respective datasets. Group comparisons and regression models were used to evaluate interactions between RS or LS with AD pathology on cognition.
resultsAcross cohorts, up to 31% of individuals were not in a relationship, and up to 22% lived alone. Individuals in a relationship (RS+) or those who lived with someone (LS+) showed poorer cognitive performance than those not in a relationship (RS-) or living alone (LS-) at comparable levels of AD pathology. Interaction analyses indicated that the association between AD pathology and MMSE differed by LS, with LS+ being associated with slightly lower MMSE scores across pathology levels, an effect primarily driven by participants living with someone who is not a partner. In contrast, within the NACC cohort, RS+ individuals showed overall lower MMSE scores, while the association between AD pathology and MMSE was weaker compared to RS- individuals. DISCUSSION: LS and RS showed differences in how AD pathology related to global cognitive status. Being in a relationship was linked to a weaker association between AD pathology and global cognitive status, whereas living with someone was associated with a lower global cognitive status at comparable levels of pathology. While the direction of these associations remains unclear, our findings suggest that the relationship between AD pathology and cognitive status may vary across different structural social contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.