ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2026
Renovating the Barnes maze for mouse models of dementia with STARR FIELD: A 4-day protocol for learning rate, retention, and cognitive flexibility.
Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Land-based spatial mazes are a low-stress method to evaluate learning in rodent models of dementia. By using innate exploratory and hiding behavior, the Barnes maze requires fewer trials, allowing examination of early learning rate and retention, as well as executive and motivational features that can be characteristic of non-amnestic dementias. However, unwanted odor cues may disrupt interpretation of acquisition rate during typical learning trials. We designed and tested our Barnes FIELD protocol (Find the Invisible Exit to Locate the Domicile) to improve reproducibility, allow evaluation of learning trials, and limit experimenter influence. The protocol uses 3D-printed escape shuttles and docking tunnels, allowing mice to exit the maze to the home cage. We show evidence that our shuttles mitigate the possibility of undesired cues. We demonstrate the feasibility of our protocol across several models of cognitive impairment and aging, and develop an additional stage, the STARR (Spatial Training And Rapid Reversal) maze, to better challenge behavioral flexibility. By examining commonly used outcome measures we identify important considerations for interpretation. These insights are used to evaluate several models of cognitive change, including deficits in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model and behavioral flexibility in a model of brainstem dysfunction. This work provides comprehensive instructions to build, perform, and analyze a robust spatial maze that expands the range of behavioral and motivational outcomes that can be identified and screened. Our findings will aid interpretation of traditional protocols, enhance rigor and reproducibility, and provide an updated method to screen for cognitive changes in mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.