Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41966201›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2025

Managed Competition in Healthcare (?) Comment on "Measuring Active Purchasing in Healthcare: Analysing Reallocations of Funds Between Providers to Evaluate Purchasing Systems Performance in the Netherlands".

Juraj Nemec

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Juraj NemecFaculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0002-5881-7422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article comments on the paper by Stadhouders et al titled "Measuring Active Purchasing in Healthcare: Analysing Reallocations of Funds Between Providers to Evaluate Purchasing Systems Performance in the Netherlands." Its main aim is to respond to the fact that the paper, without discussion, assumes that competitive reform stimulates the efficient allocation of funds. To achieve this goal, this article discusses existing knowledge related to the author's assumption, highlighting that there is no uniform theory regarding the capacity of market forces to regulate healthcare markets. It also argues that market-based healthcare reforms may be very risky in countries with limited state regulatory capacity and widespread corruption.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareEconomic CompetitionHealth Care ReformManaged CompetitionHumansNetherlandsHealthcareHealthcare ReformManaged Competition

Identifiers

PMID41966201
PMCPMC12573142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.