Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41966199›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2025

Bridging Environmental Impact and Patient Outcomes Comment on "A Review of the Applicability of Current Green Practices in Healthcare Facilities".

Connie Cai Ru Gan, Hansoo Kim

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Connie Cai Ru GanGriffith Institute for Human and Environmental Resilience (GIHER), Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2252-349X
Hansoo KimSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intersection of healthcare sustainability and clinical practice presents complex challenges in implementing circular economy (CE) principles. This commentary examines Soares and colleagues review of green practices in healthcare facilities while identifying significant gaps in the current discourse. While healthcare facilities are adopting sustainability measures like renewable energy and efficiency improvements, the implementation faces significant operational challenges, particularly in embedding environmental considerations in the clinical decision-making and care delivery process. The analysis discusses that overdiagnosis and low-value care contribute substantially to healthcare's environmental footprint, exemplified through screening cases that demonstrate the delicate balance between clinical necessity and resource utilisation. We emphasize the need for context-specific approaches that acknowledge operational realities and stakeholder diversity within healthcare governance. We advocate for an integrated approach that places health outcomes at the center of climate initiatives, recognising that public health interventions must equally consider environmental impacts. Ultimately, we call for a paradigm shift that moves beyond siloed environmental initiatives toward systemic integration that complements rather than competes with clinical responsibilities.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmentHealth FacilitiesClimate ChangeDelivery of Health CareHumansCircular EconomyClimate ChangeEnvironmental ImpactHealthcare FacilitiesPlanetary HealthSustainable Healthcare

Identifiers

PMID41966199
PMCPMC12573133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.