ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2025
Bridging Environmental Impact and Patient Outcomes Comment on "A Review of the Applicability of Current Green Practices in Healthcare Facilities".
Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intersection of healthcare sustainability and clinical practice presents complex challenges in implementing circular economy (CE) principles. This commentary examines Soares and colleagues review of green practices in healthcare facilities while identifying significant gaps in the current discourse. While healthcare facilities are adopting sustainability measures like renewable energy and efficiency improvements, the implementation faces significant operational challenges, particularly in embedding environmental considerations in the clinical decision-making and care delivery process. The analysis discusses that overdiagnosis and low-value care contribute substantially to healthcare's environmental footprint, exemplified through screening cases that demonstrate the delicate balance between clinical necessity and resource utilisation. We emphasize the need for context-specific approaches that acknowledge operational realities and stakeholder diversity within healthcare governance. We advocate for an integrated approach that places health outcomes at the center of climate initiatives, recognising that public health interventions must equally consider environmental impacts. Ultimately, we call for a paradigm shift that moves beyond siloed environmental initiatives toward systemic integration that complements rather than competes with clinical responsibilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.