ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2025
Cross-sectoral Food Systems Policy Action for Nutrition: Lessons From National, Regional, and Global Experience.
Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Policy Progress in Using Economic Policy Instruments to Improve Nutrition: Challenges and Opportunities.Health economics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImproving nutrition is a global priority for food systems transformation. The introduction of policy measures across multiple sectors relevant to food systems is critical to this transformation. However, integrating measures to improve nutrition into food system policies across multiple government sectors has proved challenging.
methodsA theory-informed qualitative policy analysis was conducted to identify enablers and barriers of "cross-sectoral" policy action for nutrition in government sectors related to the food system. The analysis drew on interview data (n=43) with policy-makers at global, regional, and national level, in diverse policy sectors, who had experience of engaging successfully across food system policy sectors to improve nutrition.
resultsSuccess in cross-sectoral policy related to the achievement of nutrition objectives in a way that also enabled achievement of other sectoral objectives, and involved strategic and constructive policy engagement across sectors. Challenges included the need to overcome diverse sectoral mandates and norms, siloed structures of governance, and fluctuations in political interest to engage effectively across sectors for policy change. Key enablers of cross-sectoral policy for nutrition included: supportive institutional structures, such as platforms for engagement, mandates and incentives; ideas that facilitated constructive engagement between policy sectors, including a shared vision, a long-term approach and effective framing; discursive approaches to engagement that balanced multiple interests across policy sectors; and ongoing learning.
conclusionThis analysis provides new insights to strengthen policy engagement and design more effective capacity building for nutrition policy-makers. This includes "soft skills" that enable effective engagement across sectors and strategic approaches to managing diverse interests influencing policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.