ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2025
Licensing Issues at Primary Clinics Resulting From the Omnibus Law in Indonesia: A Case Study From Surabaya City.
Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnecdotal evidence has indicated that Indonesian primary care clinics struggle to meet new licensing requirements under the new Omnibus Law in 2020. This study aimed to analyse the challenges associated with clinic licensing under this Law and identify potential practical solutions.
methodsThis was a sequential exploratory mixed-method case study in Surabaya, the second-largest city in Indonesia. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling from a District Health Office WhatsApp group of 38% of primary clinics in Surabaya (85/223). We used a quantitative survey to assess primary clinics' compliance with the new requirements. Subsequently, survey participants and key stakeholders were invited to two-phase focus group discussions (FGDs) where survey findings were reported and discussed. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were thematically analysed; both were synthesised at the final data analysis.
resultsThe survey response rate was 35% (30/85 clinics in the WhatsApp group). Compliance with the new regulation varied, with 17% of the clinics still awaiting license approval and 27% needing to obtain waste management permits. Eighteen survey participants and six key stakeholders participated in the FGDs. Five key challenges in primary clinic licensing were identified: regulation shifting, knowledge and perception, weakness in system design, time, and cost.
conclusionThe more complex licensing requirements have caused delays in license issuance for a convenience sample of primary clinics in this study. Ineffective communication and a lack of understanding between clinics, local government agencies, and external consultants have exacerbated these issues, leading to a heavy burden on clinic resources. To mitigate these challenges, policy-makers should prioritize simplifying sequential requirements, enhancing interagency coordination, and establishing clear communication channels-ensuring regulatory changes align with on-the-ground capacity and needs. By addressing these gaps, the licensing process can become more efficient and transparent, ultimately supporting clinic sustainability and healthcare access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.