Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41966165›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2025

We Should Pay More Attention to Cross-sectoral Cooperation, Incentives and Practice-Oriented Evaluation Comment on "The Effect of Integrated Care After Discharge From Hospitals on Outcomes Among Korean Older Adults".

Eva Blozik

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eva BlozikInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8134-2421

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In their study, Choi and Yoo analysed a pilot project of the Koran government providing integrated care of older adults discharged from hospitals. The pilot project resulted in reduced length of home stay, cost reduction in total expenses and emergency visits for participants compared to controls, but increased hospital readmissions. This commentary provides actionable insights for stakeholders and researchers interested in testing, implementing and monitoring integrated care services in routine care settings. An essential requirement is that barriers and success factors of such projects need to be addressed in scientific evaluations. Also, understanding implementation projects as a continuous quality improvement process may increase knowledge gain and practical relevance of innovative initiatives. Furthermore, heterogeneity across healthcare providers, patient populations, and regions should be considered an asset from which different solutions can emerge. Regulatory authorities are in the position to create a framework so that stakeholders have the required scope for action.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedPatient DischargeAgedHumansPatient ReadmissionPilot ProjectsQuality ImprovementRepublic of KoreaCollaborationEvaluationImplementationIncentivesIntegrated CareQuality of Care

Identifiers

PMID41966165
PMCPMC12958243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.