Bridging Levels of Influence: Insights on Policies for Integrating Nurse Practitioners Into Health Systems Comment on "Development of a Taxonomy of Policy Interventions for Integrating Nurse Practitioners Into Health Systems".

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Regulatory Coherence and Professional Competency Development in Nursing: A Scoping Review and Policy Analysis of the Mexican Health System in an International Context.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
   Review
2. The International Advanced Practice Nurse Integration Model: A Response to Recent Commentaries.International journal of health policy and management · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Development of a Taxonomy of Policy Interventions for Integrating Nurse Practitioners into Health Systems.2024

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as