Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41965931›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2026

Accurate prediction of ecDNA in interphase cancer cells using deep neural networks.

Gino Prasad, Utkrisht Rajkumar, Ellis J Curtis, Ivy Tsz-Lo Wong, Xiaowei Yan, Shu Zhang, Lotte Brückner, Kristen Turner, Julie Wiese, Justin Wahl and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Gino Prasad *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4590-1278
Utkrisht Rajkumar *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Ellis J CurtisDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ivy Tsz-Lo WongDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9761-3422
Xiaowei YanDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4846-8812
Shu ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lotte BrücknerDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6155-2277
Kristen TurnerBoundless Bio, San Diego, CA, USA.
Julie WieseBoundless Bio, San Diego, CA, USA.
Justin WahlBoundless Bio, San Diego, CA, USA.
Homa HemmatiBoundless Bio, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sihan WuChildren's Medical Center Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, US.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8329-7492
Jessica TheissenDepartment of Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Matthias FischerDepartment of Experimental Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1363-1242
Howard Y ChangCenter for Personal Dynamic Regulomes, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9459-4393
Anton G HenssenDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1534-778X
Paul S MischelDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4560-2211
Vineet BafnaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. vbafna@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5810-6241

Funding

eDyNAmiC - STANFORDOT2CA278688 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PAUL S MISCHEL · 2022 to 2026
$7.7M
Software and algorithms for elucidating the structure, function, and evolution of extrachromosomal DNAU24CA264379 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BAFNA, VINEET, MESIROV, JILL P. · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
Computational methods for detecting patterns of complex genomic variationR01GM114362 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Vineet Bafna · 2016 to 2026
$3.1M
eDyNAmiC - UCSDOT2CA278635 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Vineet Bafna · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
Nikon A1Rsi resonant spectral confocal microscopeS10OD010580 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FULLER, MARGARET T · 2013 to 2013
$377k
Cancer Research UK (CRUK) CGCATF-2021/100012+ CGCATF-2021/100025Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (Cancer Research Fund of the Damon Runyon-Walter Winchell Foundation) DRG-2474-22National Science Foundation (NSF) DGE-2545911NCI NIH HHS OT2 CA278635NCI NIH HHS OT2 CA278688NCI NIH HHS U24 CA264379NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114362NIH HHS S10 OD010580U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services) OT 140D042590013U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) U24CA264379U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) R01GM114362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncogene amplification is a key driver of cancer pathogenesis and is often mediated by extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA). EcDNA amplifications are associated with increased pathogenicity of cancer and poorer outcomes for patients. EcDNA can be detected accurately using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) when cells are arrested in metaphase. However, the majority of cancer cells are non-mitotic and must be analyzed in interphase, where it is difficult to discern extrachromosomal amplifications from chromosomal amplifications. Thus, there is a need for methods that accurately predict oncogene amplification status from interphase cells.We present interSeg, a deep learning-based tool to cytogenetically classify oncogene amplification status as extrachromosomally amplified (EC-amp), intrachromosomally amplified (HSR-amp), or not amplified, from interphase FISH images. We trained and validated interSeg on 652 images (40,446 nuclei). Tests on 215 cultured cell and tissue model images (9,733 nuclei) showed 89% and 97% accuracy at the nuclear and sample levels, respectively. The neuroblastoma patient tissue hold-out set (67 samples and 1,937 nuclei) also revealed 97% accuracy at the sample level in detecting the presence of focal amplification. In experimentally and computationally mixed images, interSeg accurately predicted the level of heterogeneity. The results showcase interSeg as an important method for analyzing oncogene amplifications.

Indexed as

Deep LearningExtrachromosomal DNAInterphaseNeoplasmsOncogenesGene AmplificationHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceExtrachromosomal DNA

Identifiers

PMID41965931
PMCPMC13265960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.