ArticleScientific reports2026
A hybrid approach based on deep feature extraction and machine learning classification for structural damage detection in concrete structures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concrete structures are a vital component of urban infrastructure, requiring regular maintenance to ensure public safety and structural integrity. A crucial element of this maintenance is the identification of surface cracks, which have traditionally relied on manual inspection methods that were frequently work-intensive, subjective, and sometimes dangerous. This work presents a hybrid methodology that integrates deep feature extraction with machine learning classification for identifying structural deterioration in concrete components. A publicly accessible dataset comprising photos of both cracked and uncracked concrete surfaces was used. Deep features were extracted using VGG16, a convolutional neural network widely recognized for its success in visual pattern recognition. Several machine learning algorithms were used for classification of these features, including Artificial Neural Network, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machines and k-Nearest Neighbors. The experimental results indicate that, the highest accuracy was achieved by SVM (99.883%), followed closely by ANN (99.873%), k-NN (99.598%), and DT (99.580%), while RF performed the lowest (98.050%). Although not limited to seismic applications, the proposed method has the potential to be integrated into post-earthquake structural assessment workflows as part of structural health monitoring systems. Using deep learning and machine learning methodologies to detect damage in concrete infrastructure may enhance efficiency and precision, enhancing urban resilience and risk mitigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.